YES-Capital-Data Updated
January 21, 2023
The YES Database on state-level capital stock data for the US has been updated to reflect the most recent updates and revisions provided by the BEA.
January 21, 2023
The YES Database on state-level capital stock data for the US has been updated to reflect the most recent updates and revisions provided by the BEA.
October 14th, 2022
Discussion Paper 2022/2 is now available: Makram El-Shagi / Lin Zhang: The role of SOEs in the transmission of fiscal policy shocks in China
Abstract:
In this paper, we demonstrate the importance of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) for the conduct of fiscal policy in China using both a structural VAR based on macroeconomic data and a panel model utilizing firm-level data. We show that SOEs respond fundamentally differently to fiscal policy shocks than non-SOEs. Our results strongly indicate that SOEs are not merely competition to non-SOEs but rather that their resources are leveraged as part of fiscal policy to support and stabilize the private economy.
June 21st, 2022
Discussion Paper 2022/1 is now available: Yihao Xue / Qiaoyu Liang / Bing Tong: The Effects of Energy Supply Shocks and Interest Rate Liberalization in China
Abstract:
Based on a New Keynesian model with a transient interest rate peg and energy inputs in production, we examine the impact of China’s interest rate liberalization on the transmission of energy supply shocks. Theoretical analysis shows that in the face of negative supply shocks, output decreases less or even increases while inflation rises more under a fixed interest rate compared with a flexible interest rate. We construct the Divisia energy index based on Chinese data to test the model predictions. We identify energy supply shocks following the strategy of Kilian (2009) and obtain impulse responses using the local projection method proposed by Jord`a (2005). The empirical results are consistent with our model predictions.
November 3rd, 2021
We are excited to announce that the program of our HenU/INFER Workshop on Applied Macroeconomics 5.5 is now available featuring keynote speeches by Prof. Helmut Lütkepohl, Prof. Song (Micheal) Zheng, and Prof. Joshua Aizenman as well as over 30 excellent paper presentations from scholars in China and the rest of the world.
November 3rd, 2021
In our latest Policy Forum, we show that the PBoC manages to conduct diverse monetary policy across the country, a feat that might be very interesting for other central banks in charge of very heterogeneous areas such as the ECB. For more details also check our CFDS Discussion Paper (DP 2020/5).
July 11th, 2021
Discussion Paper 2021/2 is now available: El-Shagi, M. / Ma, Y.: Nine blind men and the PBoC
Abstract:
Over the past decade, several dozen papers have been written that identify the People’s Bank of China’s monetary policy shocks. Yet, what often seems like minor differences in measurements of monetary policy and identifying assumptions yield vastly different implied shocks. In this paper, we pitch 20 shock time series from the literature against each other in a horse race. We use a local projections framework to produce impulse responses based on all shocks for production, prices, money and interest rates and use them to assess the economic plausibility of the competing results. Our results confirm the frequently mentioned relevance of monetary aggregates for Chinese monetary policy but also point the importance of using forward looking policy reaction functions (or account for forward looking variables in a VAR framework) when identifying monetary policy shocks.
June 4th, 2021
Our latest Policy Forum deals with the implications of the famous trilemma between open capital markets, free exchange rates, and monetary autonomy for China.
April 30th, 2021
Our 2021Q1 Monetary Policy Report featuring our Q1 update of Chinese Divisia data is now online. Find out about the monetary and financial changes during the last few months.
April 13th, 2021
Discussion Paper 2021/1 is now available: El-Shagi, M. / Tochkov, K.: Divisia Monetary Aggregates for Russia: Money Demand, GDP Nowcasting, and the Price Puzzle
Abstract:
The lack of developed financial markets and well-functioning transmission channels assigns monetary aggregates in emerging economies the potential role of nominal anchor, intermediate target, or informational variable for monetary policy. The effectiveness of this approach relies crucially on the correct measurement of money, which is not fulfilled by the conventional index based on the simple sum of financial assets. This paper calculates alternative Divisia monetary aggregates for Russia over the period 1998-2019, which account for the level of liquidity of a given monetary asset by assigning weights according to the usefulness of that asset for transaction services. Divisia is found to follow a growth pattern markedly different from the simple sum, whereby deviations between the two series are even more pronounced when foreign-currency accounts are included. We conduct three empirical exercises to demonstrate the advantages of Divisia over the simple sum. Divisia confirms the stability of the money demand function and reflects portfolio shifts in response to changes in the opportunity cost of simple sum. Lastly, Divisia mitigates the price puzzle phenomenon relative to the conventional measure. We conclude that Divisia monetary aggregates would improve the effectiveness of monetary policy in Russia.
April 8th, 2021
Our latest Policy Forum deals with the Chinese financial and monetary system.